Mobility Monitor, BedEx and AMS tackle the same strategic bottleneck — by different routes, at different speeds of impact. This overview helps you find the right entry point for your institution.
Each of the three platforms is effective on its own — and delivers added power in combination. The order follows the sequence institutions typically implement in practice: AMS as the fastest entry point, BedEx as a targeted addition, Mobility Monitor as a strategic extension.
To help you find the right sequence for your institution — honestly, with no sugarcoating. Every platform has its strength. This matrix shows which one makes the most sense, and when.
| Dimension | AMS | BedEx | Mobility Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Effect | Care time release, pressure ulcer prophylaxis, staff relief | Fall reduction, protection of fall‑at‑risk patients | Risk detection, data‑driven care management |
| Effectspeed | From day 1 | Over weeks | Mid-term |
| Implementation profile | Plug-and-play. On the bed, button press, done. | connect nurse call system | Strategic project: training, processes, data competence. |
| IT integration | Not required | Not required | Software installation. Integration into IT infrastructure, available at multiple workstations. |
| Prerequisites in the institution | No special | Fall risk identification, responsiveness | Quality management maturity, data competence, engaged nursing leadership |
| Strategic reach | Operational relief | Targeted prevention | Data-driven care management |
The answer depends on which pressure is greatest in your institution. In most cases it is the nursing-time bottleneck — and then AMS is the natural entry point. But depending on the situation, another route may make more sense.
Structural release of nursing time, effective immediately. The team feels the relief within the first shift. No training lead time, no change project. Exactly what relieves the acute pressure of daily nursing work.
More about AMS →BedEx tackles the fall rate directly. If nursing-time pressure is high at the same time, AMS is worth adding alongside — because the team responding to BedEx alerts needs relief elsewhere.
More about BedEx →Once the structures are mature (quality management, nursing leadership, training capacity), MoMo reaches its full leverage. Many institutions start with AMS first to free up nursing time — and bring in MoMo later, once the team has room for the data work.
More about Mobility Monitor →The lowest barrier to implementation, nursing-time relief you feel right away, a pilot that works from day one. If you want to make the first effect visible, this is where you start — and you can extend modularly to BedEx and Mobility Monitor at any time, as soon as the structures are ready.
The three platforms can be deployed independently, yet they build into a continuous architecture: reclaim nursing time, prevent critical events, steer care with data.
Create operational relief — the precondition for care to regain room to act at all. The fastest, lowest-barrier stage.
More about AMS →Once the operational situation has stabilized, add targeted fall prevention. The team can now respond to alerts without the routine suffering for it.
More about BedEx →On a stable operational footing, room opens up for strategic data work — sharper risk detection, more targeted measures, evidence-based quality management.
More about Mobility Monitor →In a 30-minute strategy consultation, we work through the specific situation of your institution — and recommend the point at which entry will produce the fastest, most visible effect.